We use cookies to understand how you use our site and to improve your experience. This includes personalizing content and advertising. To learn more, click here. By continuing to use our site, you accept our use of cookies, revised Privacy Policy and Terms of Service.
You are being directed to ZacksTrade, a division of LBMZ Securities and licensed broker-dealer. ZacksTrade and Zacks.com are separate companies. The web link between the two companies is not a solicitation or offer to invest in a particular security or type of security. ZacksTrade does not endorse or adopt any particular investment strategy, any analyst opinion/rating/report or any approach to evaluating individual securities.
If you wish to go to ZacksTrade, click OK. If you do not, click Cancel.
Nomura, RBS Appeal Against $839M Mortgage Bond Case Annulled
Read MoreHide Full Article
The 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in New York has rescinded the appeal filed by two of the world’s biggest banks — Nomura Holdings, Inc. (NMR - Free Report) and The Royal Bank of Scotland Group plc — to overturn a settlement agreed in 2015. Per the settlement, these banking giants were ordered to pay $839 million over misrepresentation of documents in selling of mortgage backed securities.
Notably, the banks were accused by the Federal Housing Finance Agency’s (FHFA) of providing fraudulent details regarding mortgages sold to the government-backed mortgage financiers, Federal National Mortgage Association (FNMA - Free Report) and Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corp. (FMCC - Free Report) .
Members of the three-judge panel enquired Tulchin and RBS's lawyer as to how the banks were not guilty if the quality of the loans represented by them on which Fannie and Freddie relied on while buying the mortgage bonds were fraudulent. Therefore, the appeal was rejected.
"Defendants may not hide behind a market downturn that is in part their own making simply because their conduct was a relatively small part of the problem," Circuit Judge Wesley wrote on behalf of the panel.
However, spokespersons of both Nomura and RBS refrained from comments.
Background
The FHFA has accused Japan-based Nomura, sponsor of the above-mentioned securities, and Royal Bank of Scotland, the underwriter, of providing it with misleading details about securities worth $2 billion. Both were found guilty in May 2015 by the U.S. District Judge, Denise Cote, in Manhattan after a non-jury trial and were directed to pay $806 million, including $26.6 million to Fannie Mae and $779.4 million to Freddie Mac. Further, in September 2015, the banks were directed to pay an additional $33 million, over and above $806 million.
Many financial institutions resorted to inappropriate, misleading, aggressive and fraudulent methods to boost the companies’ mortgage operations during the pre-crisis period which fueled the sub-prime mortgage crisis. Consequently, Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae reached the brink of bankruptcy and the government intervened to rescue these lenders.
In order to avoid such fiascos in the future, the regulators started implementing stringent restrictions. Consequently in 2011, the FHFA sued 18 financial organizations, including Wall Street majors like The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. (GS) and Bank of America Corp. (BAC) for selling faulty mortgage-backed securities to Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae that caused investors severe losses. FHFA has reached nearly $23 billion in settlements with several of these banks.
Conclusion
Banks across the globe have been facing increasing scrutiny for business practices. Many of the firms have paid billions of dollars as fines and compensation to settle lawsuits and probes. A number of investors have lost their hard-earned money as a result of such business malpractices. Such settlements help reinstate investors’ confidence in law enforcement agencies. Moreover, it reduces the existing litigation burden of banks.
Nomura carries a Zacks Rank #3 (Hold), while Royal Bank of Scotland carries a Zacks Rank #2 (Buy).
It's hard to believe, even for us at Zacks. But while the market gained +18.8% from 2016 - Q1 2017, our top stock-picking screens have returned +157.0%, +128.0%, +97.8%, +94.7%, and +90.2% respectively.
And this outperformance has not just been a recent phenomenon. Over the years it has been remarkably consistent. From 2000 - Q1 2017, the composite yearly average gain for these strategies has beaten the market more than 11X over. Maybe even more remarkable is the fact that we're willing to share their latest stocks with you without cost or obligation.
Image: Bigstock
Nomura, RBS Appeal Against $839M Mortgage Bond Case Annulled
The 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in New York has rescinded the appeal filed by two of the world’s biggest banks — Nomura Holdings, Inc. (NMR - Free Report) and The Royal Bank of Scotland Group plc — to overturn a settlement agreed in 2015. Per the settlement, these banking giants were ordered to pay $839 million over misrepresentation of documents in selling of mortgage backed securities.
Notably, the banks were accused by the Federal Housing Finance Agency’s (FHFA) of providing fraudulent details regarding mortgages sold to the government-backed mortgage financiers, Federal National Mortgage Association (FNMA - Free Report) and Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corp. (FMCC - Free Report) .
Members of the three-judge panel enquired Tulchin and RBS's lawyer as to how the banks were not guilty if the quality of the loans represented by them on which Fannie and Freddie relied on while buying the mortgage bonds were fraudulent. Therefore, the appeal was rejected.
"Defendants may not hide behind a market downturn that is in part their own making simply because their conduct was a relatively small part of the problem," Circuit Judge Wesley wrote on behalf of the panel.
However, spokespersons of both Nomura and RBS refrained from comments.
Background
The FHFA has accused Japan-based Nomura, sponsor of the above-mentioned securities, and Royal Bank of Scotland, the underwriter, of providing it with misleading details about securities worth $2 billion. Both were found guilty in May 2015 by the U.S. District Judge, Denise Cote, in Manhattan after a non-jury trial and were directed to pay $806 million, including $26.6 million to Fannie Mae and $779.4 million to Freddie Mac. Further, in September 2015, the banks were directed to pay an additional $33 million, over and above $806 million.
Many financial institutions resorted to inappropriate, misleading, aggressive and fraudulent methods to boost the companies’ mortgage operations during the pre-crisis period which fueled the sub-prime mortgage crisis. Consequently, Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae reached the brink of bankruptcy and the government intervened to rescue these lenders.
In order to avoid such fiascos in the future, the regulators started implementing stringent restrictions. Consequently in 2011, the FHFA sued 18 financial organizations, including Wall Street majors like The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. (GS) and Bank of America Corp. (BAC) for selling faulty mortgage-backed securities to Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae that caused investors severe losses. FHFA has reached nearly $23 billion in settlements with several of these banks.
Conclusion
Banks across the globe have been facing increasing scrutiny for business practices. Many of the firms have paid billions of dollars as fines and compensation to settle lawsuits and probes. A number of investors have lost their hard-earned money as a result of such business malpractices. Such settlements help reinstate investors’ confidence in law enforcement agencies. Moreover, it reduces the existing litigation burden of banks.
Nomura carries a Zacks Rank #3 (Hold), while Royal Bank of Scotland carries a Zacks Rank #2 (Buy).
You can see the complete list of today’s Zacks #1 Rank (Strong Buy) stocks here.
Today's Stocks from Zacks' Hottest Strategies
It's hard to believe, even for us at Zacks. But while the market gained +18.8% from 2016 - Q1 2017, our top stock-picking screens have returned +157.0%, +128.0%, +97.8%, +94.7%, and +90.2% respectively.
And this outperformance has not just been a recent phenomenon. Over the years it has been remarkably consistent. From 2000 - Q1 2017, the composite yearly average gain for these strategies has beaten the market more than 11X over. Maybe even more remarkable is the fact that we're willing to share their latest stocks with you without cost or obligation.
See Them Free>>