Back to top

Image: Bigstock

FERC OK's Mountain Valley Pipeline: A Brief on the Project

Read MoreHide Full Article

The Mountain Valley Pipeline (“MVP”) has finally received the green signal from the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (“FERC”) to commence operations. This decision marks the culmination of a protracted and contentious journey that has spanned nearly a decade, involving fierce legal battles, environmental concerns, and significant financial overruns.

The Green Light

FERC's letter of approval concluded that the pipeline had met all necessary stabilization and restoration requirements. The agency expressed satisfaction with the decision, indicating that final preparations are underway to initiate commercial operations. Although the exact date for the commencement of natural gas flow remains undisclosed, the completion of this 303-mile infrastructure is a significant milestone for its developers and supporters.

A Decade of Roadblocks

Initially proposed in 2014 with an anticipated in-service date in 2018, the MVP has faced numerous setbacks. The project's cost has ballooned from $3.5 billion to approximately $7.85 billion due to extensive legal and regulatory hurdles. Construction, which began in 2018, was frequently interrupted by court battles over environmental permits.

Environmentalists and local communities have persistently opposed the project, highlighting the ecological damage caused by its construction. The pipeline's route through the Appalachian Mountains has led to significant erosion and sedimentation issues, prompting several regulatory fines and judicial reviews. The Virginia Department of Environmental Quality has imposed over $2 million in fines for violations related to erosion and sediment control.

Congressional Intervention and Final Push

Facing mounting delays and rising costs, the MVP project received a crucial boost from Congress. In a bipartisan move to raise the debt ceiling, Congress passed legislation in 2022 that mandated the completion of the MVP, deeming it a national interest project. This legislative push effectively shielded the project from further legal obstructions, enabling the final phases of construction to proceed.

Despite this political support, the pipeline's readiness continued to be questioned, especially after a section ruptured during pressure testing in May 2023. The U.S. Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration (“PHMSA”) required extensive additional testing, which the MVP successfully completed, paving the way for FERC's final approval.

Importance of the MVP

The MVP is designed to transport up to 2 billion cubic feet of natural gas per day from the Marcellus and Utica shale formations in West Virginia to markets along the East Coast. Proponents argue that the pipeline is vital for bolstering the country's energy supply and security, potentially reducing energy costs and dependence on foreign energy sources. The pipeline's supporters also emphasize the economic benefits, including job creation and increased revenues for local economies along its route.

Companies Involved

The MVP is a joint venture involving several major energy companies. Equitrans Midstream Corporation (ETRN - Free Report) , the leading developer, along with NextEra Energy (NEE - Free Report) , Consolidated Edison (ED - Free Report) , AltaGas, and RGC Resources, have all invested in this extensive project. Equitrans will operate the pipeline, which interconnects with the Transcontinental Gas Pipeline Co. at its southern terminus in Virginia.

Once in service, Equitrans Midstream, the primary interest owner, will operate the pipeline. Investors should know that natural gas producer EQT Corporation (EQT - Free Report) announced an agreement in March to acquire Zacks Rank #3 (Hold) ETRN in an all-stock deal valued at approximately $14 billion, including debt. The transaction is scheduled to be closed in the fourth quarter.

You can see the complete list of today’s Zacks #1 Rank (Strong Buy) stocks here.

Ongoing Concerns

Despite the federal approval, opposition remains vocal. Environmental groups continue to highlight the potential risks associated with the pipeline. Concerns about safety, environmental degradation, and the long-term impacts on local communities persist. Critics argue that the pipeline's benefits do not outweigh the environmental and social costs, citing instances of water contamination and habitat destruction.

Published in