We use cookies to understand how you use our site and to improve your experience. This includes personalizing content and advertising. To learn more, click here. By continuing to use our site, you accept our use of cookies, revised Privacy Policy and Terms of Service.
You are being directed to ZacksTrade, a division of LBMZ Securities and licensed broker-dealer. ZacksTrade and Zacks.com are separate companies. The web link between the two companies is not a solicitation or offer to invest in a particular security or type of security. ZacksTrade does not endorse or adopt any particular investment strategy, any analyst opinion/rating/report or any approach to evaluating individual securities.
If you wish to go to ZacksTrade, click OK. If you do not, click Cancel.
While the ETF industry is growing by leaps and bounds, investors’ inclination toward passive ETFs is quite remarkable. There are about 1836 non-leveraged ETFs listed on U.S. indexes with an average market-cap of $3.29 trillion and average expense ratio of 0.57%, as per xtf.com.
Among them, 900 are passively managed, followed by 740 ETFs following the enhanced strategy and 196 active funds. It is being noted that though the investment objective of active funds looks more promising, the gush of money is flowing into passive investment vehicles, as per John “Mac” McQuown, co-founder of Dimensional Fund Advisors, (ab the $550bn investment group), as quoted on Financial Times.
Inside the Increasing Interest in Passive Funds
Low Expense Ratio
The outperformance was attributed to the strong performance and a low expense ratio. Expense ratios of active funds are higher than passive funds. Low expense ratio has been instrumental lately in amassing investors’ assets. Most ETF issuers have embarked upon the fee war (read: BlackRock Slashes Fees, ETF Price War Intensifies).
BlackRock has been pretty proactive in slashing expense ratios for several products in a year. It is being said that the company took the step to give tough competition to other low-cost players like Vanguard and Schwab. As a result, the company has been witnessing strong inflows in recent quarters (read: Solid ETF Asset Inflows Boost BlackRock Earnings).
For example, BlackRock lowered fees for its S&P 500 tracking ETF, iShares Core S&P 500 (IVV - Free Report) , from 0.07% to 0.04%. The fee cut made IVV less expensive than another popular ETF, SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY - Free Report) , in its domain. The fund charges 9 bps in fees. However, yet another S&P 500-based ETF, Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO - Free Report) , also charges 4 bps in fees (read: Buy These ETFs as BlackRock Cuts Fees).
The Financial Times article went on to explain that “BlackRock and Vanguard, the two biggest players in the passive investing world, manage nearly $11tn between them, having taken in nearly $600bn this year — the vast majority of it in ETFs and index-tracking mutual funds.”
Bull Market
Since Trump’s win last November, Wall Street has been buoyant barring some occasional slips. The global economy has been prospering, giving ways to a broad-based bull market, in which most market-linked products are trending. This in turn marred the appeal for active ETFs.
Some of the top-performing active ETFs in the last one-year frame were ARK Web x.0 ETF (ARKW - Free Report) (up 70.9%) followed by ARK Innovation ETF (ARKK - Free Report) (up 68.8%) and ARK Industrial Innovation ETF (ARKQ - Free Report) (up 56.5%).
And the top-performing passive ETFs were Guggenheim China Technology ETF (CQQQ - Free Report) (up 70.1%), Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF (LIT - Free Report) (up 66.1%), VanEck Vectors Rare Earth/Strat Metals ETF (REMX - Free Report) (up 61.2%), Global X Robotics & Artfcl Intllgnc ETF (BOTZ - Free Report) (up 58.4%) and iShares PHLX Semiconductor ETF (SOXX - Free Report) (up 48.7%).
In a year, Europe-based active fund First Trust RiverFront Dynamic Europe ETFRFEU (which charges 83 bps in fees) has gained 25.5% (as of Nov 17) while the passive fund Vanguard FTSE Europe ETF (VGK - Free Report) (which charges 10 bps in fees) has added 25%.
If performances of passive ETFs are on par with (or even better than) the active ones, why will investors flock to active ETFs at higher charges?
Quantitative Strategies of Passive ETFs
Several passive ETFs are factor-based and use quantitative strategies. In line with the article published on Financial Times, we also believe that such strategies make passive ETFs more active and position them better to pick the right stock.
Downside of Transparency in Active ETFs
One of the major drawbacks of actively managed ETFs is the obligation of the disclosure of daily portfolio holdings, which run the risk of enabling “front-running” of portfolio trades. This means that the revelation of stock holdings will give the issuer’s competitors or other investors a chance to cash in on advance information (read: Will Active ETFs Rule Ahead?).
Want key ETF info delivered straight to your inbox?
Zacks’ free Fund Newsletter will brief you on top news and analysis, as well as top-performing ETFs, each week. Get it free >>
See More Zacks Research for These Tickers
Normally $25 each - click below to receive one report FREE:
Image: Bigstock
4 Reasons Why Investors Love Passive ETFs
While the ETF industry is growing by leaps and bounds, investors’ inclination toward passive ETFs is quite remarkable. There are about 1836 non-leveraged ETFs listed on U.S. indexes with an average market-cap of $3.29 trillion and average expense ratio of 0.57%, as per xtf.com.
Among them, 900 are passively managed, followed by 740 ETFs following the enhanced strategy and 196 active funds. It is being noted that though the investment objective of active funds looks more promising, the gush of money is flowing into passive investment vehicles, as per John “Mac” McQuown, co-founder of Dimensional Fund Advisors, (ab the $550bn investment group), as quoted on Financial Times.
Inside the Increasing Interest in Passive Funds
Low Expense Ratio
The outperformance was attributed to the strong performance and a low expense ratio. Expense ratios of active funds are higher than passive funds. Low expense ratio has been instrumental lately in amassing investors’ assets. Most ETF issuers have embarked upon the fee war (read: BlackRock Slashes Fees, ETF Price War Intensifies).
BlackRock has been pretty proactive in slashing expense ratios for several products in a year. It is being said that the company took the step to give tough competition to other low-cost players like Vanguard and Schwab. As a result, the company has been witnessing strong inflows in recent quarters (read: Solid ETF Asset Inflows Boost BlackRock Earnings).
For example, BlackRock lowered fees for its S&P 500 tracking ETF, iShares Core S&P 500 (IVV - Free Report) , from 0.07% to 0.04%. The fee cut made IVV less expensive than another popular ETF, SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY - Free Report) , in its domain. The fund charges 9 bps in fees. However, yet another S&P 500-based ETF, Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO - Free Report) , also charges 4 bps in fees (read: Buy These ETFs as BlackRock Cuts Fees).
The Financial Times article went on to explain that “BlackRock and Vanguard, the two biggest players in the passive investing world, manage nearly $11tn between them, having taken in nearly $600bn this year — the vast majority of it in ETFs and index-tracking mutual funds.”
Bull Market
Since Trump’s win last November, Wall Street has been buoyant barring some occasional slips. The global economy has been prospering, giving ways to a broad-based bull market, in which most market-linked products are trending. This in turn marred the appeal for active ETFs.
Some of the top-performing active ETFs in the last one-year frame were ARK Web x.0 ETF (ARKW - Free Report) (up 70.9%) followed by ARK Innovation ETF (ARKK - Free Report) (up 68.8%) and ARK Industrial Innovation ETF (ARKQ - Free Report) (up 56.5%).
And the top-performing passive ETFs were Guggenheim China Technology ETF (CQQQ - Free Report) (up 70.1%), Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF (LIT - Free Report) (up 66.1%), VanEck Vectors Rare Earth/Strat Metals ETF (REMX - Free Report) (up 61.2%), Global X Robotics & Artfcl Intllgnc ETF (BOTZ - Free Report) (up 58.4%) and iShares PHLX Semiconductor ETF (SOXX - Free Report) (up 48.7%).
In a year, Europe-based active fund First Trust RiverFront Dynamic Europe ETF RFEU (which charges 83 bps in fees) has gained 25.5% (as of Nov 17) while the passive fund Vanguard FTSE Europe ETF (VGK - Free Report) (which charges 10 bps in fees) has added 25%.
If performances of passive ETFs are on par with (or even better than) the active ones, why will investors flock to active ETFs at higher charges?
Quantitative Strategies of Passive ETFs
Several passive ETFs are factor-based and use quantitative strategies. In line with the article published on Financial Times, we also believe that such strategies make passive ETFs more active and position them better to pick the right stock.
Downside of Transparency in Active ETFs
One of the major drawbacks of actively managed ETFs is the obligation of the disclosure of daily portfolio holdings, which run the risk of enabling “front-running” of portfolio trades. This means that the revelation of stock holdings will give the issuer’s competitors or other investors a chance to cash in on advance information (read: Will Active ETFs Rule Ahead?).
Want key ETF info delivered straight to your inbox?
Zacks’ free Fund Newsletter will brief you on top news and analysis, as well as top-performing ETFs, each week. Get it free >>